AGW Myth Proceeds Apace With No End to Crooked Science

NER: The Man-Made-Warming scam has been running for decades, albeit morphed into various pseudonyms when the truth caught up with it. Now the Covid lies and denials are following the same pattern, illustrating that both form part of the Great Reset. Science, and the medical establishment, are destroying all credibility and only fools look to them for guidance.





In 2009, a whistleblower released emails showing how climate academia was manipulating/destroying data, and blocking publication of articles which didn’t support their anthropogenic global warming agenda.

“Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with the Climategate whitewash,” wrote reporter Christopher Booker for the back in November, 2009.

Even The Guardian’s George Monbiot expressed total shock and dismay at the picture revealed by the hacked emails, as their authors are not just any old bunch of academics.

“Their importance cannot be overestimated,” continued Brooker.

“What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”

Professor Philip Jones was the director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) from 1998 to 2016 — during this time, Jones was in charge of the two key sets of data used by the IPCC to draw up its reports.

Through its link to the Hadley Centre, part of the UK Met Office, which selects most of the IPCC’s key scientific contributors, Jones’ global temperature record was, and remains, the most important on which the IPCC and governments rely when making policy decisions — not least for their predictions that the world will warm to catastrophic levels unless trillions of dollars are spent to avert it.

Jones is also a key part of the closely knit group of American and British scientists responsible for promoting that picture of world temperatures conveyed by Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, which turned climate history on its head by claiming that, after 1,000 years of decline, global temperatures recently shot up to their highest level in recorded history:

Michael Mann’s Hockey Stick graph.

Mann’s “hockey stick” was the basis for the IPCC’s conclusion that “there is discernible human impact on climate.” However, and in a first step toward restoring the rigor of science in the global climate debate, a committee of the National Academy of Sciences back in 2006 presented the results of its directed study of the science behind the infamous graph.

The Academy’s report identified the failure of the hockey stick to model climate beyond the past 400 years, as evidenced by its inability to reflect the mediaeval climate optimum (MCO).

The optimum has been extensively documented by recorded human history and proxies, but cannot be explained by computer models based on equations that assume that greenhouse gases dominate climate change. These same models predict massive increases in Earth’s atmospheric temperature because of the additions of a small percentage of human-derived carbon dioxide.

The IPCC needed to remove the MCO from the historical record books because the period blew apart their global warming theory: any forcing other than CO2 able to cause terrestrial warming is an inconvenient spanner in the works, and so, with the help of Mann, the panel completely erased every one of them from history in one clean swipe.

This was a brazen plan, particularly given the extensive data, records and proxies out there demonstrating that the MCO did indeed occur. These same natural records also prove the existence of the cyclic and preceding Roman-era warm event, and the very same data, records and proxies are on show again today during our modern warming event.

Climate, it turns out, is driven mainly by the Sun and the impact solar activity has on the oceans: ironically, it is the IPCC that are the true climate deniers.

Dr. Tim Ball’s temperature graph for the past 1,000 years is generally considered much closer to the actual reality.

Below are a few of the ‘hacked’ exchanges between Philip Jones and Michael Mann between 1999 and 2008 (courtesy of The Guardian):


From: Phil Jones <>
To: “Michael E. Mann” <>
Date: Wed Mar 31 09:09:04 2004
… Recently rejected two papers (one for JGR and for GRL) from people saying CRU has it wrong over Siberia. Went to town in both reviews, hopefully successfully. If either appears I will be very surprised, but you never know with GRL.

Jones did not specify which papers he had rejected. But one appears to have been by Lars Kamel, which claimed to have found much less warming in Siberia than Jones.

It was a rare example of someone trying to replicate Jones’ analysis — one of the key ways in which science validates itself. So on the face of it, there was good reason to publish, even if flaws needed correcting. But the paper was rejected by Geophysical Research Letters, partly it seems because Jones “went to town”.

This raises important questions about conflict of interest in scientific peer review, and how Jones wielded his power as a reviewer.


From: Phil Jones <>
To: “Michael E. Mann” <>
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004
… I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !

Jones is writing about two new papers. One, from two known sceptics Ross McKitrick and Pat Michaels, claimed to show a correlation between the geographical patterns of warming and of industrialization, suggesting that local urbanization rather than the global influence of greenhouse gases were often key in warming on land.

Jones evidently wanted to use his position as a lead author to keep the paper out of the IPCC report. In the event, the paper was not mentioned in early chapter drafts, but was added to a final version, where its findings were dismissed as “not statistically significant”.

Critics say that by keeping it out of early drafts, Jones prevented reviewers scrutinizing his conclusion.


From: Phil Jones <>
To:, Tom Wigley <>
Date: Wed Dec 3 13:57:09 2008
When the FOI requests began here, the FOI person said we had to abide by the requests. It took a couple of half hour sessions – one at a screen, to convince them otherwise showing them what CA [Climate Audit] was all about. Once they became aware of the types of people we were dealing with, everyone at UEA (in the registry and in the Environmental Sciences school – the head of school and a few others) became very supportive. I’ve got to know the FOI person quite well and the Chief Librarian – who deals with appeals…

Climate Audit is the web site run by Steve McIntyre, a Canadian mathematician peppering Jones with requests for his data. There is no legal basis for rejecting FOI requests on the basis of the “types of people” they are.

The records show that the university turned down most FOI requests, from McIntyre and others, for CRU data. Of 105 requests concerning CRU submitted up to December 2009, the university had by late January 2010, acceded in full to only 10.


Phil Jones wrote to Mike Mann in 2008:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise… Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address. We will be getting Caspar to do likewise…

British sceptic David Holland had recently asked CRU for all emails sent and received by its tree-ring specialist Keith Briffa about the recently published IPCC report, of which Briffa was a lead author.

Briffa had been in correspondence with Mann and two American researchers, Gene Wahl and Caspar Ammann, who had a forthcoming paper defending Mann’s controversial “hockey stick” graph.

This secret correspondence was outside the IPCC’s formal review process and seemed to break its rules.

Clearly, CRU people wanted to hide this correspondence from FOI requests. This email persuaded the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office that the university was “acting so as to prevent intentionally the disclosure of requested information”, and thus requests were “not dealt with as they should have been under the legislation”.

‘Climategate’ runs a lot deeper than the four emails and two scientists shown above.

The scale is actually jaw-dropping, and the email hack should have been enough to take the AGW scam down.

Here are two additional emails (images & highlighting courtesy of Tony Heller over at

All this clearly reveals that fraud, lies and cover-ups are the backbone of the ‘global warming theory’.

The fact that the scam is still ongoing, and has actually gained further-traction in recent years, is testament to the agendas and powerful propagandizing at play.

The moronic masses have been duped into thinking the world is actually ending.

Our youth have been completely corrupted, transformed into a parroting mob devoid of ANY understanding of the topic at hand. The boredom of teendom has been given a phony purpose: to fight the threat posed by rising carbon dioxide emissions, and in future years, as these noisy, entitled pricks come of age –and win elected office– I can only imagine the devastating, economy wrecking and fuel poverty-inducing policies they will keenly implement.

Globalisation, socialism, population control, and an overall redistribution of power appear to be the end goals here, with –as is always the case– “fear” being used as the driving force.

I can’t picture a better way to thumb-down the masses than making them think world is ending, and moreover, convincing them that it is their modern, comfortable way of life that is the root cause.

This is evil.

This is genius.

Hats off.


“I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s,” says Dr Gerhard. “I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.

Dr Gerhard is a retired geologist from the University of Kansas.

He obtained a B.S. in Geology in 1958, an M.S. in Palaeontology minor. in 1961, and a Ph.D. in Geology in 1964.

Gerhard believes that climate change has been a natural phenomenon driven by natural processes for 4.5 billion years. But that cultural pressures now exist to identify a human cause for current trends.

As Peter Flawn, President Emeritus of the University of Texas, writes, “All geologists early in their careers are introduced to solving problems through multiple working hypotheses — of deriving solutions from the data rather than, as is common among some social scientists, settling upon a solution consistent with the reigning theory and supporting it with data selectively chosen.” Gerhard adds, “that although many geologists have expressed concern about the paucity of data supporting supposed human-driven climate change, scientific tests to falsify the hypothesis have been lacking.

”In 2001, Dr Gerhard was listed as an expert reviewer of the previous two IPCC reports. He considers his stance on Earth’s climate objective and based on science, aspects he feels IPCC reports routinely lack.

“Some argue that the Arctic is melting, with the warmest-ever temperatures,” says Gerhard, continuing, “One should ask, ‘How long is ever?’ The answer is since 1979. And then ask, ‘Is it still warming?’ The answer is unequivocally ‘No.’ Earth temperatures are cooling.”

Gerhard states that the global temperature changes naturally all of the time, in both directions and at many scales of intensity.

“The warmest year in the U.S. in the last century was 1934 (with cooling observed after 1998) absolutely falsifying claims that human carbon dioxide emissions are a controlling factor in Earth temperature.

“During the last 100 years, temperature has both risen and fallen, including the present cooling — and ALL the changes in temperature of the last 100 years are in normal historic ranges, both in absolute value and, most importantly, rate of change,” concludes Gerhard.

I’m sick of the lies — lies made a thousands times worse by the climatic reality that is actually barrelling towards us: The COLD TIMES appear to be returning, the mid-latitudes are REFREEZING, in line with the great conjunctionhistorically low solar activitycloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jet stream flow (among other forcings).

Both NOAA and NASA appear to agree, if you read between the lines, with NOAA saying we’re entering a ‘full-blown’ Grand Solar Minimum in the late-2020s, and NASA seeing this upcoming solar cycle (25) as “the weakest of the past 200 years”, with the agency correlating previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods of global cooling here.

Furthermore, we can’t ignore the slew of new scientific papers stating the immense impact The Beaufort Gyre could have on the Gulf Stream, and therefore the climate overall.

Prepare accordingly— learn the facts, relocate if need be, and grow your own.
Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach: Twitter are purging followers while Facebook are labelling posts as “false,” have slapped-on crippling page restrictions, and most recently have actually locked me out of my account (click here to like/follow my newly created page).

So, be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

Please also consider disabling ad blockers for, if you use one.

And/or become a Patron, by clicking here:

The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

So any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift

facebook Share on Facebook
Twitter Tweet



  1. prioris

    How did the global warming scam survive ?

    With the support of every President and virtually every member of Congress go along with the global warming idea. Where were the Governors. Where were the politicians at the state and local level. As a whole. not much different.

    You also had the fake opposition to global warming who protected the political apparatus status quo by singling out some subset of the group above while supporting others.
    They just had some scientists do the dirty work while they looked the other way.

    The Freedom Of Information offices will never release truly sensitive information. What you hope is that they make a mistake in processing or the one of the fingers you request it from doesn’t know what the other is doing.

    1. Chemist

      Not every president fell into this trap. Trump did a good job putting non-alarmist people in charge of the EPA and he fired up the hydrocarbon industry once more. This was just one of the sensible gifts he brought the USA…. but as is mentioned in the article, the “powers that be” have a goal of total power and control so Trump had to go – even if it meant synthesizing 20 million votes to do it. Everything has been destabilized as of late, it’s truly an upside down world. Truth is fiction and vice versa, good is portrayed as evil, beauty is being called ugly. I hope we make it through these trying times.

  2. John J Powers

    Thanks for the attention to the “Tolerance of Fakery” we have been served.

  3. Tina

    It has always been my understanding that the Global Warming/Climate Change scam is a gimmick to monetize carbon, and thus lead the way to eventually tax each human being for existing. Somewhere along the line, I recall that TPTB actually admitted the ultimate goal was to change the world’s monetary and taxation system, but it was long ago, but I can’t recall when or where.

    A carbon-based economy would be, in their eyes, very stable and predictable, as opposed to the current goods/services/trade human-anchored monetary system. Then, they could nuance it at will, rather than having to find event-based opportunities.

    I think Al Gore must have read The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress and took it as a brilliant idea.

  4. Anonymous

    Cap Allon:

    Water vapor controls Earth’s temperature as shown in a recent peer reviewed paper. This is well documented in the numerical relationship developed between temperature and water vapor measured as specific humidity. See Slide 11 in the simplified handout at;

    The paper is at:

    For details about the problems of Net Zero carbon see Professor Gerald Ratzer’s: Net Zero is poor policy and too expensive

    Keep up the good work.

    H. Douglas Lightfoot, P. Eng. (retired), MBA
    8 Watterson
    Baie-D’Urfe, QC H9X 3C2
    Tel: 514-457-5637

  5. JW

    I think you should consider this basic censorship is very widely spread across all forms of information. The Covid scam is one very public space which is corrupted. Not so well known the LENR-CANR debate has long been seriously deformed through censorship and scurrilous attacks from the conventional science community.

    The people behind this have boasted that they will assure that everything you know will be a lie created by themselves as desired. Over many decades they have acquired ownership or control of all information sources allowing for the complete redefinition of reality. The Ministry of Truth is very real. This is not just a a climate scam.

  6. Dale

    Most people searching for the truth in science (and other fields) have discovered that to get the truth out (e.g. Climate, the Covid-19 Scam, the economy, etc.), it is necessary to move to platforms other than Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
    I’m not going to show my bias by suggesting a particular platform other than to point out that there are at least a half-dozen of other possibilities.
    When the Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube monopolies try to push you out for not following their agenda and mantra, retaliate by quickly moving into another.
    The truth must be told…

  7. Chris Norman

    Well if we are in the beginning of a grand solar minimum we are going to witness the greatest irony in history. The problem is that you only know its a GSM until you are in it and by that time it’s to late.
    Act now.

    1. Chris Norman

      Be nice if there was an edit option.
      The problem is that you only know its a GSM when you are in it, and by that time it’s to late.

  8. Anders XX

    When climategate broke, the danish environmental minister Connie Hedegaard, later Commisar in EU, was interviewed to danish state-television, and she seemed very agitated and defensive, and said that we still didn’t want to be dependent on the oil-sheiks in the Middle East, so we should decarbonise anyway.
    She was the host of COP-15 at the time. Interestingly that year, we had a very rare snowstorms in December just days before the COP-15 started. Very ironic.
    I was related to the danish “fixer”, Becker, who travelled the world to gather consent for quite extreme measures among the 3rd world countries.
    He was fired, officially because he had spent a little to much on his expense account, but the press speculated that the real reason was, he had organised an attack on the USA to single the out a the big Co2 culprit.
    Since Denmark is a non English speaking member of the 5 eyes, that put the Prime .minister in an untenable situation.

    Personally I think it’s mostly related to the US petrodollar and the transition to a UN controlled SDR currency. Taxation and monetary transfers to the developing world controlled by UN.

    The recent 15% minimum tax on corporations was the first of a long line of globalised interventions that will starve the west. Being the owner of a world reserve currency wields enormous power and affluence without lifting a finger. USA is printing money because the debt fuelled world needs new dollars to cover debts. Oil production and new loans does generate enough of the to cover the needs, especially for the Euro-Dollar market.

    We are being led to an economic meltdown on purpose to facilitate the transition.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Other recent posts

Martin Armstrong Adviser to World’s Smartest Minds

Martin Armstrong Adviser to World’s Smartest Minds

The Hypocritical Financial Markets Posted Dec 3, 2023 By Martin Armstrong   SPREAD THE LOVE  1 min 16s QUESTION: I was told I should not listen to you because you...

read more
WEF is Implementing Depopulation Plan & Who is Resisting?

WEF is Implementing Depopulation Plan & Who is Resisting?

NER: Millions are getting rapid-acting cancers, aka turbo-cancers, from the vax. Now they’re spraying carcinogens from the sky. When will people wake up & resist this tyranny? You & your children are under attack by your own government. Exposed: The Hidden...

read more
Reducing Carbon by Depopulating the World

Reducing Carbon by Depopulating the World

EXPOSED: The Great Reset, AI Revolution & ‘Global Boiling’: Unveiling the Secret Depopulation Plan – YOU are the Carbon Footprint they want to Eliminate BY THE EXPOSÉ ON NOVEMBER 12, 2023 A chilling plan has been uncovered that should shock you to your very core....

read more
One Man & One Country Applied Science to Covid

One Man & One Country Applied Science to Covid

Anders Tegnell of Sweden showed stones of steel for he cut against the grain & told Trump administration clown car Task Force idiots, told the whole world to EFF off with their lockdown lunacy Anders won saying ‘Lockdown was never on the agenda in Sweden’ While...

read more
75 Years Later, Germany Persecutes Holocaust Survivors

75 Years Later, Germany Persecutes Holocaust Survivors

Holocaust Survivor Vera Sharav, Now Put on”Wanted“ list by German Prosecutors for Speaking the Truth. BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON NOVEMBER 6, 2023 15 month after delivering a powerful speech condemning medical experimentation without informed consent and warning of a...

read more