Definitive Rebuttal of Man-Made-Warming Scam



Below is an Open Letter to the Prime Minister of NEW ZEALAND, the Minister of Climate Change, the Vice Chancellors of NZ’s 8 universities, and John Morgan, the Chief Executive of the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA).
It is written by Peter J. Morgan B.E. (Mech.), Dip Teaching
Honorary Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Environomics (NZ) Trust
The letter begins:
Dr Patrick Frank is a vastly experienced physical methods experimental chemist at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University. (SLAC is an acronym for the original name of the laboratory, Stanford Linear Accelerator Centre.)

Like me, for at least 30 years Dr Frank in his spare time has pursued an interest in the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming, since morphed to the meaningless euphemism “Climate Change” – the climate, like the weather, changes continually.

In his Op Ed entitled “A Climate of Closet Monsters”, Dr Frank wrote:
“My work involves experiment, measurement, and theory. As in all of science, the struggle in such work is accuracy. How accurate are the measurements? How accurate is the physical description provided by the theory? Knowledge comes only with accuracy.

In 2001 I decided to investigate the claims about CO2 emissions and climate. I simply wanted to know whether the alarm was justified. So, I studied. By 2003, I knew the alarm was not justified.

The reason is this: The entire confidence that human CO2 emissions cause the climate to warm depends upon the accuracy of climate models. Climate models are an expression of the physical theory of climate. They are currently the only source of information that can tell us how the climate might react to human CO2 emissions.

What I discovered is that if the climate models are magnifying lenses, then using them to see the effect of CO2 on the climate is like trying to see atoms using a jeweler’s loupe.

In early September 2019, my study of climate models passed peer review and was published in the Atmospheric Sciences section of Frontiers in Earth Science. It answers the questions: how reliable are the climate models, and; how much credit should we give to their predictions of a hot CO2-driven future? The answers are: they are not reliable, and no credit.”
I now inform you all that on 2 June 2021, Dr Patrick Frank, in compliance with the IPCC’s own Error Reporting protocol, made a notification to the IPCC.

Here is an extract:
“In my journey of six years to publication, through nine journal submissions, 30 reviewers and their 35 reviews, I did not encounter a single climate modeler who understood physical error analysis, or propagation of error, or the meaning of model calibration or of uncertainty, or of the impact of physical error upon predictive reliability, or even of the absolutely central distinction between accuracy and precision.

Climate modelers are evidently incapable of evaluating the reliability of their own models. This finding provides an explanation for the universal recourse to a useless precision metric to purport projection reliability in their published work, rather than accuracy.

I mention these difficulties because, in evaluating the error that I have here drawn formally to your attention, you will need to consult competent experimental physicists, who do understand physical error analysis, rather than climatologists, who do not so understand.

To reiterate: none of the published air temperature projections, neither in the primary peer-reviewed literature, nor in any of the IPCC Assessment Reports, has any scientific meaning or predictive value whatsoever. No rational policy decisions may be taken on the basis of those projections.

All general-circulation models, whatever other uses they may have, are entirely unsuitable for making projections of anthropogenic global warming. They cannot tell us anything at all about how atmospheric temperatures may evolve in the future, nor explain temperature excursions of the past.

GCMs, in themselves, cannot detect, cannot attribute, and cannot project the impact of CO2 emissions on global mean surface temperatures; neither in the present nor into the 21st century.

The uncertainty propagated through simulation time-steps generates altogether too large an uncertainty envelope for the reliable projection of future warming on any timescale. The models cannot say anything about atmospheric temperature.

Global-warming projections of climate models then, are formally demonstrated to be no better than guesswork. Those projections, which provide the entire case for concern about our influence on the climate are, to put it bluntly, utterly unreliable.

They cannot provide any reliable information on whether the climate will warm or cool. For that purpose, you might as well consult the Oracle at Delphi as any or all of the general circulation climate models.”

Surprise, surprise, the IPCC has so far failed to comply with its own Error Reporting protocol and has simply ignored Dr Frank.

Prescribed in the IPCC’s Error Reporting Protocol is a three-month period in which the IPCC must respond and correct any errors that it cannot refute. Therefore, on 3 September 2021, if neither the IPCC nor any of you has been able to provide a valid scientific refutation of the paper that Dr Patrick Frank submitted to the IPCC with his notification of 2 June 2021, the Trust will publicly call upon each and every one of you to be faithful to the long-established convention of science that a paper that cannot be refuted automatically becomes the new “truth”. Should the IPCC not be able to refute Dr Frank’s paper in compliance with the IPCC’s own Error Reporting Protocol, Prime Minister Ardern must immediately withdraw New Zealand from the IPCC and announce that fact to the nation – and indeed the world. Further, Prime Minister Ardern must immediately announce to the nation – and indeed the world – that it has been proven to the IPCC that there is no climate emergency and that as soon as possible all NZ laws and regulations pertaining to “climate change” and “climate emergency” will be repealed.

Dr Frank is no longer alone in notifying the IPCC that its models have very serious errors.

Earlier this month, Viscount Monckton of Brenchley also notified the IPCC, in accordance with its own Error Reporting Protocol, of a very serious fundamental error in climate modellers’ application of a branch of engineering and physics – namely Control Systems Theory – to the computer models used to make the climate projections upon which all of the IPCC’s Assessment Reports rely. You are all aware of this error, as I have sent you several letters on the work of Viscount Monckton and his team, known as the Argonauts. To your discredit, for all intents and purposes you have all ignored those letters.

About a year ago, Viscount Monckton had notified the IPCC of the Argonauts’ findings, but the IPCC had simply ignored him. This time, he has fully complied with the IPCC’s Error Reporting Protocol. The IPCC now has nowhere to hide, and neither do any of you.

As well as Dr Frank and the Argonauts, there are several other eminent scientists who have written papers explaining serious errors in the climate models relied upon by the IPCC. For your information, more on their work will follow. I shall be encouraging the other scientists to follow the Error Reporting Protocol.

It is no longer possible for any credible argument to be made that “the science is settled”.

When is each one of you going to have your Galileo moment, realise that you are on a hiding to nothing, and concede that you have been duped?

It is now to be hoped that each one of you understands just how serious this matter is. Perhaps you might also begin to understand just why the IPCC climate models’ projections of future global mean temperatures have proven to be so wildly inaccurate and have so far cost the world many trillions of dollars, all to zero effect – in other words, trillions of dollars have been wasted. Just imagine what could have been achieved had those trillions of dollars instead been spent on reducing chemical and plastic pollution of the environment, particularly our planet’s oceans, and also on eradicating poverty in Africa by helping to build modern coal-fired power stations to provide reliable electricity.

Peter J. Morgan B.E. (Mech.), Dip Teaching
Honorary Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Environomics (NZ) Trust

New Study: 23 Experts in the fields of Solar Physics and Climate Science Contradict the IPCC — the Science is NOT Settled

Dr Ronan Connolly, lead author of the study: “The IPCC have seriously hampered scientific progress into genuinely understanding the causes of recent and future climate change. I am particularly disturbed by their inability to satisfactorily explain the rural temperature trends.”


  1. The Hoi Polloi

    My brother is a professor at a large, research, university in a large, southern, state. His field is in the natural sciences. I stopped sending him articles like this one years ago because his reaction was always the same: toe the party line, smear the source, dismiss their findings as statistical noise. (and generally, dismiss me as a rube)
    I would give him a heads-up about this error report, but I’m to the point I hope he gets run over by this (figuratively speaking, of course).
    Short of Jesus hand delivering His verdict on this subject to the IPCC (or any global, national, or regional institution for that matter), they will continue to ignore and probably take more aggressive steps to shut you up.
    It’s sad I’m this cynical, but can you blame me?

    • Neville

      Thanks Phil. Perhaps the Covid mass psychosis Dr Malone & others speak about has a parallel AGW psychosis. I started on AGW in 2009 with Prof Plimer’s book with a 1,000 references in it. I started my blog in May 2020, not because I wanted a blog but because I was alarmed at the massive Covid fraud I could see coming. I could see then that the informed had to save the world & I have spent 8 to 10 hours/day, 7 days/week on it. Even then everyone in my church Home Group, my UK brother & all his family & all my cousins, my sister’s whole large UK family & some close friends have all succumbed to the madness. The evidence is so clear & the facts clearly presented. I keep on, but its so frustrating. I just keep my first obsession of AGW alive, but I don’t focus on it. I post a few on FB usually showing 10 feet of snow caused by the warming. Thing is, the vaxx should climax within 5 years by which time we will need mass graves; but AGW still has 11 Thunberg years left, so perhaps I’ll have time.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Other recent posts

As Vax Culling Increases Buck Passing Goes Mainstream

Austrian Health Minister and Medical Profession Dispute Responsibility for Massive Covid “Vaccine” Deaths and Health Damage By Paul Craig Roberts July 2, 2022 In Austria the massive harm done to human life and health done by the Covid “vaccines”...

read more

Don’t Fear New Emerging Viruses, All Are Due To The Vax

Since the COVID Vaccine roll-out, all sorts of diseases have started to reappear. Why? Because the COVID Vaccines cause AIDS BY THE EXPOSÉ ON JULY 1, 2022 • ( LEAVE A COMMENT ) It feels like we can’t go a single week without hearing about the re-emergence, or...

read more

Globalists Will Bring New Bioweapons Until WE Stop Them

If You Still Do Not Believe the Vaccines are Weapons to Eliminate Human Life—Think Again By Dr. Igor Shepherd July 1, 2022 How long will the citizens of the Western world continue to close their eyes on the cold hard fact that they are human bullseyes for the global...

read more

Archbishop Viganò: How To Overcome Evil Of The Great Reset

EXCLUSIVE: Steve Bannon Interviews the Heroic Archbishop Viganò by EDITOR  June 30, 2022 in Assault on the Family, Economy, Globalism, Newsroom, Pandemic, Politics, Tyranny Your Excellency, after the psycho-pandemic, we now have the Russian-Ukrainian...

read more

Transhuman Agenda & The Horror Of What Vax Is Injecting

Scaffold Tissue and Nanowires Are Most Likely the Cause of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, says Dr. Ariyana Love BY RHODA WILSON ON JUNE 28, 2022 • ( 17 COMMENTS ) As evidence of rubbery “blood clot” samples pulled out of veins and arteries of “vaccinated” deceased by...

read more

21 Dead To Facilitate Globalist Disarming Agenda

The failings of the State in the Uvalde School Massacre exposed BY THE EXPOSÉ ON JUNE 30, 2022 • ( 2 COMMENTS ) The strongest protective desire, the most powerful gut reaction that humans and most mammals have as a species is to protect our young. Politics is about...

read more