One of my pet subjects, which I have not commented on here before, is the Globalist man-made-warming scam. You will have heard ad nauseam that 97% of scientists believe that man is the main contributor to global warming. This comes from two scientists, Bedford & Cook, who claimed that 97% of scientists believe that man produces CO2 and is therefore warming the planet. Well of course we all accept that fact, but the question ignored was “Is man’s contribution to planet-warming significant”? The scientific answer to that appears to be no. The deceitful conclusion of 97% consensus was hyped round the globe by vested interests, including the inevitable Obama exaggeration.
@BarackObama: Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.
Not enough for him to acknowledge its real, he has to add its all due to man and its dangerous. Now let me see how I can tax you to death for it.
Bias and fraud have perpetuated the alarmist myth to the extent that we now have just over 11 years left to live. Did you know that as far back as 2010, 1,000 international scientists debunked the IPCC claims? No of course not, because the truth is suppressed by the media and vested interests.
Climate Depot Special Report:
More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming
Claims
Scientists Continue to Debunk Fading “Consensus” in 2008 & 2009 & 2010
(Updates Previous 2009 U.S. Senate Report: “More Than 700 International Scientists
Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims”)
www.ClimateDepot.com CFACT
Released: December 8, 2010
Presented to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico,
December 9, 2010
Updates U.S. Senate Report Presented at the United Nations Climate Change
Conference in Poznan, Poland in 2008
Updated: December 22, 2008; January 27, 2009; March 16, 2009 & December 8, 2010
A study by Mark Bahmer, of the papers from which John Cook derived his 97% consensus, showed that the actual number of scientists who believe man is the main cause of global warming, was only 1.6%.
1.6%, Not 97%, Agree that Humans are the Main Cause of Global Warming
By David Henderson
I have been heavily criticised for writing about global warming as the subject is sacrosanct and I am not a qualified environmental scientist. On that basis no one could write about anything unless that was their speciality. As an engineer I feel qualified to read what others say and judge their bona fides for saying it. As such, I am totally convinced that you will all be around after the Thunberg warming has passed and will not have noticed any difference.
You know of course, that from the alarmist perspective the global warming science is settled? That is quite a remarkable statement, as in science the only things that are accepted as settled are things like gravity. Climate science is inordinately complex and definitive forecasts are almost certain to be wrong. Hence practically everything Al Gore said, on his way to making $200 million out of it, has been proven wrong.
Why would this hoax be so strongly presented and counter views be so rigorously suppressed.? The first reason is that this is a globalist agenda and the powers looking to eventually enforce a one-world-order are very powerful. All governments happily go along with it, as we currently pay multiple $billions in various taxes because we produce CO2.
The average person cannot grasp what is planned, as we have absolutely no desire to rule anyone’s life, and cannot relate to those who actually want to rule the planet.
Secondly they are presenting a cataclysmic scenario which makes for great news. Hence the media has totally bought into the hype. That’s why you can have a high-school dropout, on the cover of Times magazine, warning us that the world will end in 12 years. Greta Thunberg is your source if you want to get into the science. She’s also an authority on the Corona virus as CNN invited her onto their panel. Why would they do that? Well it’s all about getting attention and hyping up another globalist plot.
Thirdly, any scientist can present a paper showing the negative effects of global warming. It doesn’t even have to be true. He will be published, acknowledged and applauded. Any scientist wanting to study say the effects of warming on tortoises in the Karroo, will get funding readily.
Counter to this; any scientist disagreeing with the prescribed conclusions will not be funded, will not be published and will be totally ostracised.
What kind of science is that? The whole history of science is that one comes up with a hypothesis and others challenge it. That’s how we progress. But with man-made-warming and the China virus no dissent is allowed. The only logical reason is that the “science” postulated cannot stand up to scrutiny.
Here is just one example on a local level.
Alberta’s Climate Future KATHARINE HAYHOE and ANNE STONER
FINAL REPORT 2019
Hayhoe was acknowledged by Time Magazine, in 2014, as one of the top 100 most influential people. Her report was completely shredded in a 78 page report, by the Alberta Friends of Science Society. The more eminent they are, the more they falsify & exaggerate claims and the more they refute the factual evidence from other scientists they call deniers. No such thing as having a different opinion.
Alberta’s Climate Future Report Review
Friends of Science Society
2020-05-24
Here is something more dramatic to think about.
“This is a sign that solar minimum is underway,” reads SpaceWeather.com. “So far this year, the Sun has been blank 76% of the time, a rate surpassed only once before in the Space Age. Last year, 2019, the Sun was blank 77% of the time. Two consecutive years of record-setting spotlessness adds up to a very deep solar minimum, indeed.”
You know what that means? It means we are definitely going into a cooling cycle, where the man-made-warming alarmists will be begging us to burn more coal before they freeze to death. During the previous Dalton minimum, the temperature in Germany was 2 degrees lower for 20 years.
0 Comments