If you’ve fallen for this misdirection, don’t despair. The truth has always been hiding in plain sight. There’s actually no mystery. It’s not very hard to figure out. It’s just the case that our corrupt elites in government and media are very interested in obscuring the truth. Allow me to explain it with four clues that still “stick out” through all the smoke and mirrors.

Clue #1

Let’s start with the most obvious clue. In the midst of a global manhunt for Ghislaine Maxwell in the fall of 2019, a picture surfaces of the socialite sitting at a burger joint in Los Angeles reading The Book of Honour: The Secret Lives and Deaths of CIA Operatives. Does that sound like the kind of light reading that a globe-trotting British socialite normally indulges in? Why would Ghislaine Maxwell show her face in public when she knew that an international manhunt was underway to locate her — and that she was evading that search? Do you think that perhaps the picture was staged and that Ghislaine Maxwell was trying to send a signal to the American authorities by circulating this photograph in the press? Because that’s exactly what she did.

The description of The Book of Honour is another clue: “In the entrance of the CIA headquarters looms a huge marble wall into which seventy-one stars are carved-each representing an agent who has died in the line of duty. Official CIA records only name thirty-five of them, however. Undeterred by claims that revealing the identities of these “nameless stars” might compromise national security, Ted Gup sorted through thousands of documents and interviewed over 400 CIA officers in his attempt to bring their long-hidden stories to light. The result of this extraordinary work of investigation is a surprising glimpse at the real lives of secret agents, and an unprecedented history of the most compelling—and controversial—department of the US government.”

Why was the book’s title mentioned at all in the photographs that Ghislaine Maxwell’s attorneys planted in the press?

Is the mystery beginning to lift for you?

Clue #2

The corporate media suddenly discovered their interest in Jeffrey Epstein during the Trump Administration because Trump’s Labor Secretary Alex Acosta was the former U.S. attorney for Southern Florida who struck a secret deal in 2008 with Epstein’s attorneys so that the sex trafficker would plead guilty to low level charges and serve only 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail.

Acosta held a press conference to defend himself on July 10th, 2019. At one point, he was asked by a reporter: “Were you ever made aware at any point in your handling of the case that Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset of some sort?”

Acosta’s response was a classic example of a non-denial wrapped in a procedural excuse: “So, there has been reporting to that effect. And let me say, there’s been reporting to a lot of effects in this case. Not just now but over the years. And again, I would, I would hesitate to take this reporting as fact. This was a case that was brought by our office. This was a case that was brought based on the facts. And I look at the reporting and others. I can’t address it directly because of our guidelines.”

I can’t address it directly because of our guidelines.

The full video of the press conference is here (go to minute 54:00).

Are you still having trouble figuring out this mystery?

Clue #3

Why had a reporter asked Labor Secretary Alex Acosta whether Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset at that July 10th press conference? The day before, the reporter Vicki Ward had published a widely circulated piece where she outlined a conversation with “a former senior White House official” that involved Alexander Acosta and the following explosive allegation:

“Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami […] was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary.

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)

Who would have told a federal prosecutor like Alex Acosta in 2008 to back off the Epstein case? At the time, the people in charge of the FBI were Bob Mueller and his deputy Jim Comey. The DOJ went so far as to conspire with Epstein’s attorneys to avoid sending the victims “notification letters” that would inform them of Epstein’s plea deal and afford them the right to be heard at any plea hearing.

Do you, dear reader, see a pattern emerging through the smoke and mirrors yet?

Clue #4

Why were Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell allowed to operate a vast paedophile sex trafficking ring in the United States for decades in plain sight? How were they able to enjoy the company of Presidents and Prime Ministers? Or stay at the private retreats of English monarchs? Why were the rooms in Epstein’s mansions all wired with closed circuit cameras and filled with recording equipment?

Why do you think disgraced FBI Director Jim Comey’s daughter was put in charge of the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell in court? Why was the case against the negligent jail guards dropped entirely? Why do you think the trial wrapped up so quickly? Why wasn’t it not televised? These are all the hallmarks of a cover-up — orchestrated at the highest levels of our government.

Epstein and Maxwell were obviously running a classic honeypot operation — he even bragged to some of his victims that he made “blackmail” tapes of powerful people. All that you have to do is scan Jeffrey Epstein’s little black book of contacts to see it clearly: the Democrat elites in government and media and finance for three decades. He knew them all: Woody Allen, Prince Andrew, Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton, Doug Band, Tony Blair, Michael Bloomberg, John Kerry, Henry Kissinger, George Mitchell, Bill Richardson, Charlie Rose, Chuck Schumer, Maria Shriver, Kevin Spacey, Bill Cosby, George Stephanopoulos, Larry Summers, the list goes on and on. Think about it: Epstein was hanging out with Bill Cosby and Kevin Spacey and Woody Allen and Charlie Rose and Bill Clinton.

Lots and lots and lots of people have told you who Epstein was and what he was doing. Senator John McCain’s widow even got on stage at a conference on human trafficking in 2020 and admitted that “Epstein was hiding in plain sight. We all knew about him. We all knew what he was doing, but we had no one that was — no legal aspect that would go after him. They were afraid of him. For whatever reason, they were afraid of him.” What does that little admission from a member of America’s ruling class tell you? Just consider who “we” must be in that statement — and then consider who “they” must have been.

Many people missed these obvious clues because the corporate media kept insisting that Epstein was too mysterious to figure out. It was an easy answer, but was it true? Nobody wants to hear that the U.S. intelligence community was protecting a man running a global podophile sex trafficking ring in plain sight. That would raise too many uncomfortable questions about how many American politicians had been totally compromised over the years — and who controlled them.