To understand the implication of this approach you need to be aware of the risk of taking an unproven vaccine. More and more cases are being recorded of significant, even life-threatening side effects of the vaccines.
Taking one is a risk, taking the mandatory two significantly increases the risk. Continually recharging your immune system with ingredients KNOWN ONLY to the vaccine manufacturers is a recipe for disaster. Just wait for the next moves, which will probably include vaccination every 3 months as they “discover” the “protection” doesn’t last longer.
Medical tyranny at the hands of Technocrats will advance with an endless stream of human-altering vaccines until the power is ripped out of their unelected, unaccountable hands. There is no such thing as voluntary withdrawal. Power is never voluntarily abandoned. ⁃ TN Editor
“The sort of criteria that might be introduced… is that when one travels internationally for a short trip, going on vacation for example, that one is vaccinated each time on that occasion for that particular trip.”
Scientists at Oxford University have suggested that people may need to have a coronavirus vaccination not once, not twice, but EVERY time they want to travel out of their home country.
The scientists published a report in the Royal Society Journal last week that acknowledged there is little data on how efficient or long lasting the current vaccines are, and so it is likely that countries will require a recent vaccination.
Having endless vaccinations when there is no indication of how effective they are, or what long term side effects there may be sounds absolutely mental, but that is what is being suggested.
Speaking to the London Telegraph, Epidemiologist Christopher Dye, a leading author of the reports stated “If we thought that the duration of protection was just a matter of months, then the sort of criteria that might be introduced – we’re not saying they should be – is that when one travels internationally for a short trip, going on vacation for example, that one is vaccinated each time on that occasion for that particular trip.”
The scientists also stated that vaccine passports are “feasible,” but only when global standards can be agreed upon.
“An effective vaccine passport system that would allow the return to pre-Covid activities, including travel, without compromising personal or public health, must meet a set of demanding criteria,” said Dye.
Other co-authors of the study wanted that the covid passports, which the government’s vaccines minister has repeatedly said are not going to be used domestically, “need to be fully explored.”
Professor Melinda Mills warned that such a system “could inadvertently discriminate or exacerbate existing inequalities,” adding “The intended use will have significant implications across a wide range of legal and ethical issues.”
“Is it literally a passport to allow international travel or could it be used domestically to allow holders greater freedoms?” Professor Mills further questioned.
“We need a broader discussion about multiple aspects of a vaccine passport, from the science of immunity through to data privacy, technical challenges and the ethics and legality of how it might be used,” Mills added.
- It Begins: Ticketmaster To Check Vaccination Status…
- China Begins Unproven But Widespread Vaccination Program
- Welsh To Receive Certificate Of Vaccination To Prove Status
- Vaccination Credential Initiative: Big Tech Tackles…
- Fauci: Mask Wearing Needed Into 2022
- Big Pharma CEO: COVID Vaccines Needed ‘For Years’ To Come
- Robot Strawberry Pickers To Prove That Humans Are Not Needed