Listen Now

At the Grand Jury of the People’s Court of Public Opinion, James Bush gave his testimony about Operation Dark Winter, the Rockefeller Lock Step simulation and Event 201.

Operation Dark Winter was the code name for a simulation of a high-level bioterrorist attack conducted on 22-23 June 2001. The purpose was to simulate a covert and large-scale smallpox attack on the United States.

(Related: Operation Dark Winter)

In May 2010 a planning report released by the Rockefeller Foundation was published, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.” It describes a series of scenarios, including a pandemic, in which technology could be used to help to restore humanity and includes a section called “Lock Step.”

(Related: Operation Lock Step – The Sinister Agenda behind Covid-19)

Event 201, a tabletop exercise held on 18 October 2019, simulated the effects of a pandemic caused by a coronavirus originating in bats but passing to humans via pigs.

(Related: All Roads Lead to Dark Winter and Interview with James Bush)

James, ‘Jim’, Bush is a former United States Marine Corps officer, engineer at Honeywell, engineering and biosafety manager of North Colorado Medical Centre, engineering/operations manager for Centre for Disease Control (CDC) Vector Born Disease Research Centre, and participant of the Operation Dark Winter exercise in 2001.

Operation Dark Winter was an exercise designed to simulate the possible reaction to a deliberate introduction of smallpox in three States in 2002. What would happen if a local biological weapon attack were to hit America with a contagious pathogen that could cripple the country?

“The government response will pose a normal challenge to civil liberties … In the beginning documentation [for Operation Dark Winter], some of the first terms are “civil liberties” and what they are going to take away during this event.”

He then briefly highlighted some aspects of Operation Lock Step, Event 201, Operation Mockingbird, and the number and levels of biosafety laboratories worldwide.

“The enhanced development and genetic modifications of diseases is practiced all over the world. And ostensibly it’s used for the development of medication and preventive medicine. But the reality is – and I say this having been there running the laboratories, I’ve worked on six coronaviruses, I worked on 78 other biosafety level three and three plus diseases – the reason that the universities and the military and the government do this research is a bioweapons program. They are trying to find tools that are less expensive to use against a common enemy, develop tools that they can control the whole development of the process.

“When I worked for CDC and CSU, there was never a time that I saw any vaccine go out in less than six years. And they tried to tell us, they tried to tell people of science, that they have created vaccines that are safe. And there are four different [Covid] vaccines that do different things to the human body. “And oh, by the way, we did it in less than nine months.” Ladies and gentlemen, I can only tell you that from my perspective, it’s lies, lies and damn lies,” Bush testified.

Below is the video of Bush’s testimony and the transcript.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Bitchute.

Further Resources

Watch the full Grand Jury Day 2 – Historical and Geopolitical Background, 12 February 2022 (5 hrs 47 mins), HERE or HERE (with chapters and timestamps).

Logistic support is provided to the proceedings by the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee: website (German) or website (English).

More information about the proceedings can be found on the Grand Jury’s website: www.grand-jury.net

Transcript James Bush

(links contained within the text below are our own)

I’m absolutely flabbergasted by everything I’ve heard today, the intelligence and the experience of the team that’s producing this. So, I wanted to thank you all.

My credentials are very simple. I retired after 20 years of the United States Marine Corps as a Lieutenant Colonel. I was an infantry officer, a Force Recon Officer, and then I became an engineer, and I worked as an engineer for the Honeywell Corporation as a launch guidance engineer for the shuttle program. And then I became a special operations engineer for special environments and mechanical systems. I was the Engineering Officer and Manager for the North Colorado Medical Centre for the Infectious Disease Research Centre at Colorado State University in Colorado, and for the Centre for Disease Control Vector-Borne Research Facility in Colorado, Fort Collins, Colorado.

My interest in this, actually peaked well before I had gotten into the knowledge of what was going on today, I was working for Hewlett Packard, and in my engineering capacity, I was the Biosafety Officer for the Rocky Mountain West. And I was invited to go to a program called Dark Winter in Oklahoma City in June of 2001. And at this point, I’m not sure how I was there.

Share screen. I’m going to share my screen and I’ll pull up a fairly quick and I am sincere it’s quicker than the others’ presentation. Let me see if that will open up. There we go. I don’t know why that’s still showing up. There you go.

So that’s my resume. I already went through that with you. I’ve masters science degree in mechanical engineering at BS and Epidemiology.

This is Dark Winter. You’ve heard it referenced, and you may already be aware of it, but it was ostensibly a program supported by the government and private organisations in June 22-23rd of 2001. At Andrews Air Force Base in Oklahoma City.

You’ve heard, and I’ll just mention, Anser Homeland Security and CSIS, the Oklahoma National Memorial Centre for Civilian Biodefense. These are all organisations that were precursors of all of the elements that it takes to eventually create a bioweapons system in the United States.

So, these Dark Winter slides that they’re seeing is only a very small portion of a  slide set that was generated during that presentation. And it wasn’t a presentation, it wasn’t a real study. They called us and said, we’re going to study this. But basically, when we got there, they said, “okay, here’s what we’re doing and sit back and watch and here’s what we have come to, conclusions. Please take this back to your companies and to your organisations and share it with them. Because the government was totally in control of this.”

It was an exercise designed to simulate the possible reaction to a deliberate introduction of smallpox in three States in 2002.

Dark Winter was developed as a program by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and the Johns Hopkins Centre and the Anser for Homeland Security. And I believe you’ve all heard those names before, and you’re going to continue to hear as you go through this process of analysing what’s happening to our country. Anser Institute for Homeland Security was eventually converted to a nationally funded cabinet post called Homeland Security.

The key participants, I’m going to show you who they are, what the goals are, the introduction, it was a scenario. So, our government, as you know, and many governments really love scenarios. They like, “well, what if we do this? What if this happens? What will be the next steps?”

So, this was supposed to be a scenario study, but please note the characters that were playing this.

This is in 2001 and some of the most key people in the government and the defence of the United States of America took their time off to go to Oklahoma City and ask the question, “what happens if we get hit by smallpox?”

Smallpox is clearly defined by every organisation out there – the World Health Organisation and the CDC, FEMA – everybody says it’s a pandemic disease because it has a fatality rate, a true live fatality rate of about 32% to 33%, as opposed to the coronavirus, which, depending on who you’re talking to, is maybe 0.012%. So, they were using a true pandemic disease to see what would happen.

But the people who came would say, “I’m not a US Senator” – Frank Keating, he was the governor of Oklahoma; the National Security Advisor to the United States; the CIA director from the United States, the Secretary of Defence, John White; the chairman of the United States military, the joint chiefs of staff, general John Tilelli; Secretary of State for the United States, Frank Wisner; the Secretary of Health and Human Services was Margaret Hamburg; the Attorney General, George Terwilliger; the director of FEMA, Jerry Hauer; and, the director of the FBI.

Now, I’m sure that this type of assemblage of people has been formed before, but I don’t think in the history of the United States they’ve ever come into a meeting like this, created a document, created a scenario, and then disappeared. Because within two or three days of this program being ended, some of us got actual copies of the slide set, and everywhere else it disappeared. It was on the internet for a while. But if you recall, back in 2001, the internet is not what it is today. And it took me several years to find this on the internet. In the meantime, I had a copy of it on my computer. And later, when I worked for the infectious disease research centre and the CDC, I would bring this up to various researchers and ask them what they think of it, and they would all kind of turn green and walk away. They didn’t want to talk about what this was about.

So, the question is what would happen if a local biological weapon attack were to hit America with a contagious pathogen that could cripple the country? The government response will pose a normal challenge to civil liberties. The less prepared we are, the more threats there will be to civil liberties. In the beginning documentation, some of the first terms are “civil liberties” and what they are going to take away during this event.

I’m going to stay on that page for a moment and just say to you: that during this study, it was two days long and we got out early because this study, when we got there, they had all kinds of slides. And I’ll be glad to show these slides to anybody who wants to see them. But the slides really show the thought process, the initiation of an agenda whereby they wanted to share with the people in the room. And the people in the room were people of science and industry and business. And they were saying to us, “how will this affect you?” They showed what happened after one day,  after three days, after six days, how many people are sick, how many people are injured, how many people have died, and how does it progress?

This document was provided as a means to create two or three things. One, is a tutorial on how to initiate and get the results we want from a pandemic disease. The other would be is: how would we control, what would be the results? How many people would die? How do we take care of inoculations? This was of a known disease which had an extraordinarily high fatality rate. And they translated that, and that gave them the opportunity to create an outline, a primer, a document that they can use when it comes time to create a bioweapon, national security, pandemic event. That’s what they did.

And like I said, I’ll be glad to share the rest of these. My current presentation on Dark Winter is about two and a half hours long because I go into all of the details about what a biosafety level one, two, three and four facilities is. And where they are and how they’re used and how our government and our universities are studying this. But there’s a wealth of information in that slideshow and Reiner asked me to keep it relatively short. So, this is the beginning. This is the first stage where our government engaged some of the most powerful people in our administration to bring forth this concept.

The next one was Operation Lock Step. Operation Lock Step was ostensibly done by Ralph Emerson. He kept referring to John D. Rockefeller. It was claimed to be a three-step approach to a permanent lockdown, resulting in massive depopulation.

Now, I’ve done some significant research on this, and Operation Lock Step was actually a concept that was created by people doing research on not just Operation Lock Step – the book, by Ralph Epperson, The New World Order, it was 320 pages. And the prima facie information from this entire Operation Lock Step came from page 18 in that book. There are two elements. The operation lock step was created by information from the new world agenda and another program that did come out of the Rockefeller Institution. So, my question is what is it really?

So, the published document is basically people got together and they said, “okay, based on us reading the information in The New World Order, here’s what we see is happening.” And it fits fully well what’s in the 320-page document of The New World Order. And this is very clearly patterned on what actually did happen. And the reason for that is: that Operation Lock Step came out in the middle of June of July last year. There was a lot of people who tried to refute it, but there was nobody that …

… created according to the documents in 1989. So, you have 2001 – Dark Winter – you have 1989 when Operation Lock Step and the birthing documents were created for that. And then we move forward as we go through our nation’s history. We now have:

You see The New World Order by Ralph Epperson. You see the Rockefeller Foundation and the Global Trading Organisation which contributed to The New World Order.

Rockefeller contributed to the next book which is about a 54-page book called ‘Scenarios for The Future of Technology and International Development’. That was done by the Rockefeller Foundation.

And on the internet, you find that it keeps referring back to what you see on the right side of the page, which is the first phase, the second phase, the third phase. Back in 1989, nobody knew anything about 5G radiation. Nobody knew anything about, specifically, coronavirus. So somewhere this information came out but it was truly a combination of data created in The New World Order.

And I don’t know how many people have read The New World Order, but it is a malevolent and a disgusting tutorial book on how to destroy Western civilisation. And it cites George Bush and the whole litany of people that we keep talking on the Lock Step is …

Reiner Fuellmich: James, can you do us a favour and read those three paragraphs? Because I think this is extremely important for people to understand what happened in 1989.

Bush: Yeah, I’ll be glad to.

[In the Q&A at the end, Bush clarifies that this, the text below that he reads aloud and refers to as the Lock Step document/s, did not come from any of the scenario documents, such as Scenarios for The Future of Technology and International Development, but rather it is something circulating on the internet from 2020 written by an unknown author who most likely wrote it by combining his/her knowledge from various sources.]

“First phase: Common cold/Flu. Mild symptoms at most. Media endorsement of mass paranoia and fear. Flawed testing system utilised which picks up any genetic material in the body and triggers a positive result. Inflation of Covid case numbers, through changing of death certificates, double-counting, and classifying all deaths including other diseases and natural causes as Covid-19 Lockdown will condition us to live under Draconian laws, prevent protests and identify public resistance.”

That’s step one. Phase two.

“The 1st phase will lead to compromised and frail immune systems through lack of food, social distancing, wearing of masks and lack of contact with sunlight and healthy bacteria. Exposure to 5G radiation will further attack the immune system. Thus, when people re-emerge into society, more people will fall ill. This will be blamed on Covid-19. This will all occur before the vaccination is ready to justify it. A longer and more potent lockdown will follow until everyone takes the vaccine.”

That’s their intention.

“3rd phase: If majority of people resist the vaccine, a weaponised SARS/HIV/MERS virus will be released. A lot of people will die from this. It will be survival of the fittest. It will also be the ultimate push for everyone to be vaccinated, in order to return to normality. Those who have taken the vaccine will be at war with those who have not. It will be anarchy from all sides.”

And the predominance of that came from that page 18 in the other document, which is Scenarios for Future Technological and International Development.

So, this is all tied together. And when it was poured out and it was meant as a document to do two things: tell people where it’s going, and if you tell somebody that’s going to happen and you keep reading it, eventually people get okay with it happening. We’ve heard that all day today.

Let’s go to the next one.

Lock Step is the fulfilment of the concepts and goals expressed and solicited in the philosophies of the “New World Order” and the Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.

Those concepts and agendas were put into operation for Covid-19 plandemic.

The actual author of the Lock Step documents is unknown, but it is clear that The New World Order was created in 1989, and the Scenarios for a Future Technology was created in 2010. And that’s when the other document known as Lock Step was created.

The next page, I don’t know if you all can read this and I’ll try not to read too much of it, but this is the concept in the scenario. This is the Lock Step scenario. So, this was a scenario done by our government studying what Lock Step should be.

“A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.

“In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain – originating from wild geese [that’s a guess] – was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’ initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency … [I’m going to skip to the next bit] … However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions …”

This information was written, this is where the entire concept came from.

So, they had Dark Winter where they decided that they really didn’t want to use something like smallpox. And the enhanced development and genetic modifications of diseases is practiced all over the world. And ostensibly it’s used for the development of medication and preventive medicine. But the reality is – and I say this having been there running the laboratories, I’ve worked on six coronaviruses, I worked on 78 other biosafety level three and three plus diseases – the reason that the universities and the military and the government do this research is a bioweapons program. They are trying to find tools that are less expensive to use against a common enemy, develop tools that they can control the whole development of the process.

When I worked for CDC and CSU, there was never a time that I saw any vaccine go out in less than six years. And they tried to tell us, they tried to tell people of science, that they have created vaccines that are safe. And there are four different vaccines that do different things to the human body. “And oh, by the way, we did it in less than nine months.” Ladies and gentlemen, I can only tell you that from my perspective, it’s lies, lies and damn lies.

Finally, on October 18, 2019, many of you already know what happened, but the Johns Hopkins Centre, the Bill and Melinda Gates Group and the World Economic Forum – here we go back to the financial side of this atrocity.

“The Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019 in New York. The exercise illustrated areas where public private/partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to manage large scale economic and social consequences.

“Statement about the [novel coronavirus] and our pandemic exercises.

“In recent years, the world has seen a growing number of epidemic events amounting to approximately 200 events annually. These events are increasing …” and so on.

The experts agree that it’s only a matter of time before the epidemics become global.

How could they possibly put together a meeting with all of the most important people in the East Coast in New York City on October 28, and all of a sudden, less than a month later, we now have coronavirus coming out of the Wuhan province?

And I will tell you how they managed these facilities. I’ve managed one of the largest in the country at Colorado State University. They don’t accidentally get out. You can take them out. When I work there, I could walk out, any day, with your Yersinia pestis, with HIV, with tuberculosis, with all kinds of Corona. The Coronas weren’t even used in level three facilities. They were working on level two.

You asked why I left the Central Intelligence Agency.

So, the question still remains, how come all of the media – you get up in the morning and you listen to one radio station, go to a TV station, and they all say exactly the same thing?

Did you all know about Operation Mockingbird?

Mockingbird is a CIA program that was created after World War II, and it is still operational today. It’s where the CIA creates the dialogue and works with the six or seven ultra-media systems in the world. And I can say this because you don’t know her name. My daughter is a military intelligence officer with the US Army. She’s been in for twelve years. She’s a major, selected full Lieutenant Colonel. And I showed this to her and she said, “yeah, that’s what they do. They do it now.”

So, there’s lots of questions as to why. And I think the question is just exactly as every one of you have spoken to today. But this is an important piece of information that I wanted to share with you.

When I started managing the infectious disease research centres, both of them in Fort Collins about 14 years ago, there were 25 to 27 biosafety level three and four laboratories in the world.

It’s now [the year] 2022. And this is directly off the CDC’s website. I’ve compared it to other websites as well. And this is the distribution of biosafety level three and four laboratories around the world. And you can see that Australia has four. Almost all the rest of the countries have them. Germany has four. India has three. The United Kingdom has six. The United States has 15. And when I started this business, there were three.

And the biosafety level threes. Now, these are the ones that work on diseases like coronavirus, which is the influenza, which is HIV, the things that are not extraordinarily capable of being made into a bioweapon. But the BSL3s are the test beds for the fours. There are several smaller countries have one or two BSL3s.

All of the countries on the BSL4 list have similar numbers of BSL3 labs now as the BSL4. The United States of America has over 200 biosafety level three labs, in the United States. So, between BSL3 and 4, United States of America has 215 bioweapons research facilities. They call them normal research, but I can tell you it’s not true.

Reiner Fuellmich:  One question. I must ask you these two questions, because having looked at the documents you showed us from Operation Lock Step, I mean, you quoted these three paragraphs. Were these terms really included in that document? I mean, terms like Covid-19, and what’s the other one, 5G was that really included?

Bush: Very observant. And that’s absolutely the answer to the question is in the document that people are using for Lock Step, that’s exactly what they are. I found that document all over the Internet. I said I could not find an author of that particular document. It said it was page 18 in all references. It said it was a page 18, and the page 18 it was referring to was the scenario page that I had pulled up. Let me see if I can go back.

Viviane Fischer: Okay. But that’s basically like, maybe an inspiration that they used for the Lock Step scenario.

Reiner Fuellmich: No, the question is, was it really included back then? Was it in 1989, were these two terms included?

Bush: There’s the 2020 document that was on the internet:

And the Scenario for the Future of Technology and International Development. And I apologise. I was going to put page 18, well, no, this is page 18 – the Lock Step scenarios.

Reiner Fuellmich: The other one with the three paragraphs. We just looked at it. It is slide number ten. It is slide number. That’s it. That one.

Bush: Okay. This slide on the right-hand side.

Reiner Fuellmich: Yes. Is that originally from that book written in 1989?

Bush: No, it is not. And what I’m saying is the document here and this slide was made up from someone going in and referring to this page. Can you see that?

Reiner Fuellmich: Yeah.

Bush: That’s from the Lock Step, which was done by the Rockefeller Institute. They took that and they transmorphised the current events and they plugged in the concepts from this paragraph and they made it. But the world believes this.

And what the irony is, if you look at the content of the paragraph from the Scenarios for the Future of Technology document, that’s where they got this information from. And the 5G and the Covid-19 are not in that other paragraph.

Reiner Fuellmich: That’s what I thought.

Bush: Yeah. But it still ties it all together because the information was there in 1989, 2001, 2010 and then again for Event 201 in 2019.

So, there is a progression that goes along with the historical dialogue that your other history speakers and experts presented, and this one really shares the information. And from my perspective, Dark Winter is a critical factor in showing that they had the ability and the intent to do a preparation that actually reflected the same thing as Event 201. [Event] 201 was just the second Dark Winter.

[reshowing previous slides in quick succession]

So that’s Dark Winter. And that’s the information that I can share with you on Operation Mockingbird and the Lock Step.

The Lock Step, after we started doing some more research, I wanted to do exactly what you said. I wanted to find this particular page in that book – The New World Order by Ralph Epperson. I went there looking for it. It’s not there. I went for the Scenarios for the Future of Technology. It’s not there. And I looked up all the information I could on the internet, and clearly someone made that particular document to match it, and it was an attempt to coordinate that, and it gives some credence to The New World Order.

I don’t know how many people on the group right now have read The New World Order. I’m going to try to get it out of here [referring to his slides].

Reiner Fuellmich: All right. Well, the problem with documents as such as that one is that it is not only confusing, but it makes us look bad if we turn around ..

Bush: That’s why I wanted to show it to you, because I’m not sure we can use Lock Step unless we simply refer to The New World Order and the Scenarios – those two stand all the tests, Lock Step does not.

Reiner Fuellmich: I got it. Well, thank you, James. That leads us all the way to probably the World Health Organisation’s role in all of this, but we have two more speakers for that. In the meantime, however, are there any questions that Virginie Dexter, Dipali want to ask?

Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt: Thank you, Mr. Bush. Thank you for the evidence. But I just want to find out from you: you have mentioned that based on your experience, it takes approximately not less than six years before a vaccine goes to market. I would like it to make a connection with Operation Warp Speed. How does that basically tie in?

Because in a sense, it seems like when it comes to the fact that they’ve actually expedited these vaccines, Covid-19 vaccines, to the market, they justify and they say “no, but this is in line with Operation Warp Speed.” Can you basically just give some clarity in relation to that, sir?

Bush: The answer to that is they are not doing a true vaccine. They are creating a DNA modifier. It’s an injection that has nothing to do with the normal process of taking a live disease and learning how to fight it with the human biome. And applying the right chemicals and right endurances to the testing and, going over time, doing animal testing, doing human testing and developing an actual vaccine.

The material they’re injecting into people today, as far as I’m concerned. And like I said, I’ve worked on vaccines for twelve years in environments where – my job in those facilities was: I operated the biosafety committee and I kept the disease from getting out. During my tenure, there were 6000 researchers in those facilities, no-one ever got sick. So, we knew what caused the sickness. We were able to stop that. But it was also built into the understanding of the knowledge that you cannot develop a vaccine accurately in less time than six years.

And so, when I started hearing people say, we’re going to have one this year, they’re injecting materials that who knows what is in it. I’m not a physicist, I’m not an MD, and I’m not a research doctor. I worked with them. And I can tell you that there will never be an inoculation going in my arms or anyone in my family because I fear what’s in there. And that’s what some of your other experts are going to testify into as well.

Look at the results we’ve already talked about today with how people are reacting. They are reacting to something very quickly, shortly after getting the inoculation and that doesn’t stand the test of a true vaccination.

Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt: Thank you, sir.

Bush: And I just want to reiterate, if there’s any question at all. When the illusion was that some type of Wuhan disease got out of – the Wuhan laboratory is a BS3 and 4. The virus they were working on in China was in a BSL3, so it does not meet the requirement for the extreme care and consideration and security that BSL4 does. And when I managed the facilities in Colorado, we did tests to find out if people could get out of our building with a select agent. Again, go to the CDC’s website and look up select agent, and it basically tells you that a select agent is that it can be genetically modified to make it into a weapon of mass destruction. That’s why they call them select agents.

But at that time, we did tests. We had US Army Corps of Engineer, US Amber people come in, the FBI, the local fire Department, police, and we did tests to find out if somebody could get out of our facility. There was no way to stop them. If somebody wants to get out with that material, they couldn’t be stopped. So those laboratories that I just showed you the numbers on, there’s no way to stop anybody from getting those things out there. So, what they are working on, as far as I’m concerned, it’s a bioweapons program. And what they’re working on is basically the ability to modify other forms of injections to control and to kill the general population. And that’s why they’re doing it in lockstep. This is a chimeric. Are you all familiar with the chimeric concept?

Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt: Can you explain this concept?

Bush: A chimeric drug is, you develop a drug and you inject that into an animal, agent or a person, and it sets up the body for certain reactions. And then you come back with the second part of the chimera, the two-part, and you inject that, and that causes extraordinarily big changes and or death. So, I believe the inoculations are chimeric.

To go along with your question about the vaccines themselves. How is it possible that you have a disease – there’s two questions here – how is it possible you have a disease that is being solved and has a solution being created at 95% to 100% efficacy with four different types of inoculations that don’t even resemble each other in their content? And beyond that, in the history of mankind, science, medicine has never come up with a cure for the common cold and the common flu, both of which are coronaviruses.

Reiner Fuellmich: I just meant to mention that other experts who will testify have, in the meantime, clarified the situation at least as far as Pfizer-BioNTech is concerned. It does not have an efficacy of 95%. It’s less than 1%. Some people even say it has absolutely no efficacy whatsoever. This is because we see countries that have a very high vaccination rate also have very high – like Israel, like the UK – also have very high what they call breakthrough cases. So, in other words, the vaccines don’t seem to work at all. In other words, you’re probably right, Jim. We cannot call these injections vaccines but we will learn more about this from other experts.

Bush: I support everything you’re all doing and if I can help you tomorrow, I shall.

Reiner Fuellmich: Jim thank you so much. Thank you very much for walking us through these three exercises.